Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Wild Life
Bird photography,lens,subject size,crop and working distance for beginers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 508434" data-attributes="member: 15675"><p>One of the topics I would like to add to the discussion is keeper rates.</p><p>For the beginners, a good picture is generally accompanied with a series of bad pictures (certainly with birds in flight, BIF).</p><p>It is not abnormal to take 30-50 pictures to have one you really like (sharpness, composition, etc... all work together), that would be a low keeper rate.</p><p></p><p>For example my BIF keeper rate with the 600mm f4 seems a lot higher (1 keeper out of 4) then with the 70-200mm f2.8 VRII (1 keeper out of 20) which is higher then with the 70-300mm f4-5.6G. It is not only linked with the technology of the lens, but also with the user. The 70-200 I support better then the 70-300, because I have to. The 600mm is always on the best tripod, adding to the keeper rate. On the other hand I take a lot more daring shots with the 70-300mm since I can move it around more easily. </p><p></p><p>An other issue with keeper rates is that the science seems to be missing, I have seen few installations for AF + VR tests in panning shorts where no human intervention is required.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vincent, post: 508434, member: 15675"] One of the topics I would like to add to the discussion is keeper rates. For the beginners, a good picture is generally accompanied with a series of bad pictures (certainly with birds in flight, BIF). It is not abnormal to take 30-50 pictures to have one you really like (sharpness, composition, etc... all work together), that would be a low keeper rate. For example my BIF keeper rate with the 600mm f4 seems a lot higher (1 keeper out of 4) then with the 70-200mm f2.8 VRII (1 keeper out of 20) which is higher then with the 70-300mm f4-5.6G. It is not only linked with the technology of the lens, but also with the user. The 70-200 I support better then the 70-300, because I have to. The 600mm is always on the best tripod, adding to the keeper rate. On the other hand I take a lot more daring shots with the 70-300mm since I can move it around more easily. An other issue with keeper rates is that the science seems to be missing, I have seen few installations for AF + VR tests in panning shorts where no human intervention is required. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Wild Life
Bird photography,lens,subject size,crop and working distance for beginers
Top