Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Better bokeh at smaller aperture?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eurotrash" data-source="post: 124709" data-attributes="member: 9237"><p>Yep, your distance from subject to lens matters a ton. Also, lenses have different bokeh characteristics. Zooms typically have harsh looking bokeh to my eyes, whereas most 2.8-1.8 primes will be able to speed-cream a background with minimal effort.</p><p>Alternatively, if you have a 1.4 lens, you'll be able to drop an atomic bokeh bomb on any background from any distance any time you like! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>Not a huge aperture, but I was very close to the subject @ f3.2 on a 50mm 1.4:</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8547523076/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8096/8547523076_d75d13733c_z.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8547523076/" target="_blank">Sandra Portrait</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/" target="_blank">stupidphotoguy</a>, on Flickr</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, very close on a 50mm @ f1.4:</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8234/8514128996_6af284482c_z.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/" target="_blank">Lens test 1</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/" target="_blank">stupidphotoguy</a>, on Flickr</p><p></p><p>Bokeh is interesting because a few things go into making bokeh look great, not just the lens. There are several other factors at play here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eurotrash, post: 124709, member: 9237"] Yep, your distance from subject to lens matters a ton. Also, lenses have different bokeh characteristics. Zooms typically have harsh looking bokeh to my eyes, whereas most 2.8-1.8 primes will be able to speed-cream a background with minimal effort. Alternatively, if you have a 1.4 lens, you'll be able to drop an atomic bokeh bomb on any background from any distance any time you like! :p Not a huge aperture, but I was very close to the subject @ f3.2 on a 50mm 1.4: [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8547523076/][img]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8096/8547523076_d75d13733c_z.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8547523076/]Sandra Portrait[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/]stupidphotoguy[/url], on Flickr Again, very close on a 50mm @ f1.4: [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/][img]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8234/8514128996_6af284482c_z.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/stupidphotoguy/8514128996/]Lens test 1[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/stupidphotoguy/]stupidphotoguy[/url], on Flickr Bokeh is interesting because a few things go into making bokeh look great, not just the lens. There are several other factors at play here. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Better bokeh at smaller aperture?
Top