Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D500
Best quality photo for Birds photography: Lossless , Uncompressed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dangerspouse" data-source="post: 752730" data-attributes="member: 46690"><p>I'll offer a dissenting opinion, but a qualified one.</p><p></p><p>My D5500 fills its buffer after only 4 or 5 shots when shooting RAW in continuous mode. When I made my first attempt capturing hummingbirds in flight this past summer I quickly discovered why BIF people upgrade to the D500. However switching to .jpeg allowed me to pretty much glue down my shutter button and it would keep firing for as long as I liked. I may have given up the ability to process with as much detail as had I shot RAW. On the other hand, I got a bunch of pictures. I got zero with my 4/5 shot bursts.</p><p></p><p>I honestly don't think the quality suffered all that much, either:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]352062[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]352063[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]352064[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>So I guess my takeaway is this: if you have an entry level camera and need longer continuous shooting bursts, .jpeg might be preferable to RAW in that you'll probably get more shots off. But yeah, if I had that D500 I'd be all-in on RAW also.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dangerspouse, post: 752730, member: 46690"] I'll offer a dissenting opinion, but a qualified one. My D5500 fills its buffer after only 4 or 5 shots when shooting RAW in continuous mode. When I made my first attempt capturing hummingbirds in flight this past summer I quickly discovered why BIF people upgrade to the D500. However switching to .jpeg allowed me to pretty much glue down my shutter button and it would keep firing for as long as I liked. I may have given up the ability to process with as much detail as had I shot RAW. On the other hand, I got a bunch of pictures. I got zero with my 4/5 shot bursts. I honestly don't think the quality suffered all that much, either: [ATTACH=CONFIG]352062._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]352063._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]352064._xfImport[/ATTACH] So I guess my takeaway is this: if you have an entry level camera and need longer continuous shooting bursts, .jpeg might be preferable to RAW in that you'll probably get more shots off. But yeah, if I had that D500 I'd be all-in on RAW also. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D500
Best quality photo for Birds photography: Lossless , Uncompressed?
Top