Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Best model for Macro and Microscopy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 426568" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I don't know anything about microscopy but for macro it depends a bit what you want to shoot.</p><p></p><p>If you shoot subjects where light is of little importance (static subjects or if you use flash) a crop sensor might do better. With a dedicated macro lens the detail the lens will resolve is identical for a FX and DX since they're both at the exact same distance at 1:1 but while the FX might have a better SNR, the DX will have the edge detail-wise. It evidently depends which DX and FX you compare and a 36Mp FX will do better than a 24Mp. Between some the differences might be minimal and you'd need to pixel-peep to see them.</p><p></p><p>The moment light is an issue and you need to up the ISO, FX is the better choice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 426568, member: 31330"] I don't know anything about microscopy but for macro it depends a bit what you want to shoot. If you shoot subjects where light is of little importance (static subjects or if you use flash) a crop sensor might do better. With a dedicated macro lens the detail the lens will resolve is identical for a FX and DX since they're both at the exact same distance at 1:1 but while the FX might have a better SNR, the DX will have the edge detail-wise. It evidently depends which DX and FX you compare and a 36Mp FX will do better than a 24Mp. Between some the differences might be minimal and you'd need to pixel-peep to see them. The moment light is an issue and you need to up the ISO, FX is the better choice. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Best model for Macro and Microscopy
Top