Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Best editor software to learn on?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 382377" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>sorry but no. acdsee pro is <strong>way </strong>easier. clean interface. not tons of tiny little check squares and icons all over. hands down the easiest interface to understand and use and its faster to edit bulk pictures. LR sliders are very tiny thin lines and acdsee pro has bars where you can place the cursor on the bar and make <strong>minute adjustments </strong>by using the scroll wheel. youre hands will cramp trying to make minute adjustments with the tiny thin slider in LR. I can also choose to enter a number and adjust it in that manner. </p><p>I have both. it also processes adjustment much faster. it also has a non destructive workflow but I also have an edit as I go feature. basically like PS where if I save an adjustment, it will save it to the image in the folder and saves me from wasting time to export later. I can use either method for editing and for me, I dont need to readjust an image later on. also, when I delete an image in acdsee pro it removes it from the folder itself, saving me from dealing with removal later in export. it send it to the recycle bin later and it has happened I was quick to delete an image and just went into the RB and restored it without an issue. </p><p></p><p>there is no comparison in speed <strong>whatsoever</strong>. thmbnails are always loaded, unlike LR which always seems to be working. u can see it has delay. the transitions it does. its just too big for its bloated for its own good. acdsee pro is extremely fast. like I say there is no comparison with speed whatsoever. LR is way to bloated. </p><p><a href="https://photographylife.com/adobes-software-bloating-performance-issues-and-bugs" target="_blank">https://photographylife.com/adobes-software-bloating-performance-issues-and-bugs</a></p><p></p><p>I believe acdsee pro 7/8 PS CS6 and nikon NXD/NX2 is the perfect combo for ANYone needs. I use acdsee pro for 80% of the work and NX2/NXD PS for the remaining 20%</p><p></p><p>I mainly just use basic tools</p><p></p><p>exposure/contrast</p><p>lighting shadow highlight recovery</p><p>crop</p><p>sharpening</p><p>hue saturation</p><p>BW filter</p><p>rotate</p><p>dodge&burn</p><p>WB </p><p>color balance hotter/colder</p><p>advanced color control</p><p>healing brush </p><p>clone brush</p><p>distortion control</p><p>vignette</p><p></p><p>theres tons of other things. but these are the same things I will adjust over and over. not every picture needs to be adjusted though. </p><p>al;algorithm holds details extremely well in jpeg. for nef, I use nikon software. adobe is too problematic to render nikons color profiles properly. </p><p></p><p>hands down acdsee pro is faster in every way. I have both. LR is much slower. even export is faster. I adjust and save on the go so I never export but you do have that feature as well. speed wise (not features or controls) it goes in this order picassa>acdsee pro>LR>PS</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]125102[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH]125103[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>unless one owns and uses both extensively, you cannot really compare. I have both and use both (dont use LR anymore but have used it for a long time and its still on my desktop)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 382377, member: 14443"] sorry but no. acdsee pro is [B]way [/B]easier. clean interface. not tons of tiny little check squares and icons all over. hands down the easiest interface to understand and use and its faster to edit bulk pictures. LR sliders are very tiny thin lines and acdsee pro has bars where you can place the cursor on the bar and make [B]minute adjustments [/B]by using the scroll wheel. youre hands will cramp trying to make minute adjustments with the tiny thin slider in LR. I can also choose to enter a number and adjust it in that manner. I have both. it also processes adjustment much faster. it also has a non destructive workflow but I also have an edit as I go feature. basically like PS where if I save an adjustment, it will save it to the image in the folder and saves me from wasting time to export later. I can use either method for editing and for me, I dont need to readjust an image later on. also, when I delete an image in acdsee pro it removes it from the folder itself, saving me from dealing with removal later in export. it send it to the recycle bin later and it has happened I was quick to delete an image and just went into the RB and restored it without an issue. there is no comparison in speed [B]whatsoever[/B]. thmbnails are always loaded, unlike LR which always seems to be working. u can see it has delay. the transitions it does. its just too big for its bloated for its own good. acdsee pro is extremely fast. like I say there is no comparison with speed whatsoever. LR is way to bloated. [URL]https://photographylife.com/adobes-software-bloating-performance-issues-and-bugs[/URL] I believe acdsee pro 7/8 PS CS6 and nikon NXD/NX2 is the perfect combo for ANYone needs. I use acdsee pro for 80% of the work and NX2/NXD PS for the remaining 20% I mainly just use basic tools exposure/contrast lighting shadow highlight recovery crop sharpening hue saturation BW filter rotate dodge&burn WB color balance hotter/colder advanced color control healing brush clone brush distortion control vignette theres tons of other things. but these are the same things I will adjust over and over. not every picture needs to be adjusted though. al;algorithm holds details extremely well in jpeg. for nef, I use nikon software. adobe is too problematic to render nikons color profiles properly. hands down acdsee pro is faster in every way. I have both. LR is much slower. even export is faster. I adjust and save on the go so I never export but you do have that feature as well. speed wise (not features or controls) it goes in this order picassa>acdsee pro>LR>PS [ATTACH=CONFIG]125102._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]125103._xfImport[/ATTACH] unless one owns and uses both extensively, you cannot really compare. I have both and use both (dont use LR anymore but have used it for a long time and its still on my desktop) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Best editor software to learn on?
Top