Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Krs_2007" data-source="post: 320371" data-attributes="member: 12948">Yea, my normal 40 on sharpening, kind of a default for these team pictures and I dont spend a lot of time in post processing.&nbsp; This is just a hobby and the parents benefit as well I get more experience... Just clean them up and post for the families, If I find any that I really like then I will spend more time.&nbsp; Here is another from 2 weeks ago.&nbsp; This was shooting through the backstop net, so around 80 plus feet away.Also, the first one I cropped off maybe 10 percent and it was from the first base side with 70 feet baselines.&nbsp; This one I cropped a little more that 10 percent because it was a little farther away.&nbsp; Now if these were on a tripod then I think they would be sharper out of the camera, but I have to stay mobile.&nbsp; I debated between the 1.7 and 2.0 and finally decided to give the 2.0 a try and so far have been pleased[ATTACH]95656[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Krs_2007, post: 320371, member: 12948"] Yea, my normal 40 on sharpening, kind of a default for these team pictures and I dont spend a lot of time in post processing. This is just a hobby and the parents benefit as well I get more experience... Just clean them up and post for the families, If I find any that I really like then I will spend more time. Here is another from 2 weeks ago. This was shooting through the backstop net, so around 80 plus feet away. Also, the first one I cropped off maybe 10 percent and it was from the first base side with 70 feet baselines. This one I cropped a little more that 10 percent because it was a little farther away. Now if these were on a tripod then I think they would be sharper out of the camera, but I have to stay mobile. I debated between the 1.7 and 2.0 and finally decided to give the 2.0 a try and so far have been pleased [ATTACH=CONFIG]95656._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification