Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bukitimah" data-source="post: 51017" data-attributes="member: 7507">I have tried the tamron 70-300 non VR but found it difficult at 200 and above. I owned the nikon 70-300 VR and definitely it is much better. However at f4.5-5.6 it is challenging at low light. If you are shooting at low light, the 70-200 f2.8 would be a better choice in my opinion. To save cost, tamron version is slightly more than the nikon 70-300 VR. Even if you need the extra length, you could add a tele extension. This is an option I am considering but I am in no hurry. Frankly, I hardy use the 70-300 unless I am shooting wild life. Most times, 70-100 mm range suffice.</blockquote>