Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 409315" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I'm not disagreeing here; if shadow detail is important, ISO might do a better job but in reality, the gain in the shadows is very limited and flatlines at a certain ISO. The actual difference between ISO 400 and ISO 12500 in shadow improvement for my cam is that small, it's almost ridiculous.</p><p></p><p>Btw, what I do is almost exactly like negatives; those too had to be exposed before there was something to print. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 409315, member: 31330"] I'm not disagreeing here; if shadow detail is important, ISO might do a better job but in reality, the gain in the shadows is very limited and flatlines at a certain ISO. The actual difference between ISO 400 and ISO 12500 in shadow improvement for my cam is that small, it's almost ridiculous. Btw, what I do is almost exactly like negatives; those too had to be exposed before there was something to print. ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
Top
