Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 409314" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I discovered the problem. Dynamic range.</p><p></p><p>The scene has a wider dynamic range than the cam's capacity thus something has to go. For the high ISO this loss is evidently in the highlights while for low ISO, it is in the shadows.</p><p></p><p>When checking the clipping it becomes obvious which channel paid the price.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]136249[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>It was not unknown to me clipping would occur differently but I didn't make the link until now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 409314, member: 31330"] I discovered the problem. Dynamic range. The scene has a wider dynamic range than the cam's capacity thus something has to go. For the high ISO this loss is evidently in the highlights while for low ISO, it is in the shadows. When checking the clipping it becomes obvious which channel paid the price. [ATTACH=CONFIG]136249._xfImport[/ATTACH] It was not unknown to me clipping would occur differently but I didn't make the link until now. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
Top
