Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcel" data-source="post: 409312" data-attributes="member: 3903"><p>As much as I applaud your courage to try proving this theory, I'm not convinced of the value of this. Of course, you can recover a raw file, but getting the sensor to "grab" more light in the shadows specially is a huge plus for me. Now time might prove me wrong, but where I come from (film days), when you have nothing on the negative, you're left with nothing on the print.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcel, post: 409312, member: 3903"] As much as I applaud your courage to try proving this theory, I'm not convinced of the value of this. Of course, you can recover a raw file, but getting the sensor to "grab" more light in the shadows specially is a huge plus for me. Now time might prove me wrong, but where I come from (film days), when you have nothing on the negative, you're left with nothing on the print. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
Top
