Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 407301" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I processed two of my 100 shots, one mostly in NX and the other in LR. I sharpened and fine-tuned both identical and then cropped to detail. There's too much difference between RAW editors to know if post-exposure will be better in post or done in cam. </p><p></p><p>You'll only find out when doing test shots and compare them. For me, at lower ISO the difference is small, as expected but at high ISO post-exposure wins.</p><p></p><p>Here's the two shots and a detail crop. It's unbelievable how they can differ. I even gave up trying to get them identical and processed the second to my liking.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]135214[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]135215[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]135216[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]135217[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>LR is the "blue" one.</p><p></p><p>I know what brings best quality for me. You do what you like.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 407301, member: 31330"] I processed two of my 100 shots, one mostly in NX and the other in LR. I sharpened and fine-tuned both identical and then cropped to detail. There's too much difference between RAW editors to know if post-exposure will be better in post or done in cam. You'll only find out when doing test shots and compare them. For me, at lower ISO the difference is small, as expected but at high ISO post-exposure wins. Here's the two shots and a detail crop. It's unbelievable how they can differ. I even gave up trying to get them identical and processed the second to my liking. [ATTACH=CONFIG]135214._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]135215._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]135216._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]135217._xfImport[/ATTACH] LR is the "blue" one. I know what brings best quality for me. You do what you like. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Balancing Exposure and Processing
Top
