Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="adox66" data-source="post: 264740" data-attributes="member: 17861">Thanks so much for he feedback guys. Its great to hear pros and cons from objective voices.On the cropping, I did have it cropped like wev has it originally. Its my &quot;go to&quot; to have landscapes/seascapes in a two thirds/one third frame, be it from top or bottom.The reason I decided to pull it back out on this shot was, as mentioned earlier, I liked the symmetry of the non cropped version better and also those few little ripples of water towards the bottom left of the frame, I just thought they added something to the shot and wanted to keep them in.&nbsp;On the vignetting that wornish mentioned, that may have been me being a little heavy handed. I did certainly add some dark vignetting to the corners in post processing to help draw the eye to the centre.Keep em coming. Great to hear others thoughts. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="adox66, post: 264740, member: 17861"] Thanks so much for he feedback guys. Its great to hear pros and cons from objective voices. On the cropping, I did have it cropped like wev has it originally. Its my "go to" to have landscapes/seascapes in a two thirds/one third frame, be it from top or bottom. The reason I decided to pull it back out on this shot was, as mentioned earlier, I liked the symmetry of the non cropped version better and also those few little ripples of water towards the bottom left of the frame, I just thought they added something to the shot and wanted to keep them in. On the vignetting that wornish mentioned, that may have been me being a little heavy handed. I did certainly add some dark vignetting to the corners in post processing to help draw the eye to the centre. Keep em coming. Great to hear others thoughts. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification