Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 152473" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>I agree with what's been said and will just add that I would have preferred to see the shot taken at the 55mm end rather than at 32mm. Even though you are on a DX camera, 32mm really isn't like using a 48-50mm on an FX body. Take a look at her arms. Her elbow area is closest to the camera, and because it's taken at 32mm, her arms are slightly exaggerated more than they would have been if taken at 55mm. That's what wide angle lenses do--they exaggerate what is closest to the lens and push back what is further from the lens. It's still a nice photo though. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>