Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
B&W or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 421619" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>I'd say those reasons are at opposite ends of the scale. Neither B&W film or NEF files would be economical for them to support ... B&W because it is dead, and NEF because they are not up to it yet. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>It does not seem inconceivable that a service to process and print raw files might have appeal to some... It would be paying for a few minutes of personalized attention, but it could offer premium results.</p><p></p><p>But trying to make a profit today processing B&W film has obviously been abandoned. </p><p></p><p>This may be arguing film vs digital, instead of B&W vs color. Even Kodachrome is gone too. But the one hour labs have to print grayscale digital files on color paper.</p><p></p><p>If anyone enjoys B&W work, then power to them, to each his own. I'm just saying I was stuck there for years, but I've recovered now. I wish I had those years back.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 421619, member: 12496"] I'd say those reasons are at opposite ends of the scale. Neither B&W film or NEF files would be economical for them to support ... B&W because it is dead, and NEF because they are not up to it yet. :) It does not seem inconceivable that a service to process and print raw files might have appeal to some... It would be paying for a few minutes of personalized attention, but it could offer premium results. But trying to make a profit today processing B&W film has obviously been abandoned. This may be arguing film vs digital, instead of B&W vs color. Even Kodachrome is gone too. But the one hour labs have to print grayscale digital files on color paper. If anyone enjoys B&W work, then power to them, to each his own. I'm just saying I was stuck there for years, but I've recovered now. I wish I had those years back. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
B&W or not?
Top