Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fiVe" data-source="post: 232716" data-attributes="member: 17614">A very enlightening response. Thank you. I checked the test pics and found that approx. half fit this shutter-speed-to-focal-length scenario. I assume the others are different because of the way the camera metered the shot. (E.g. ISO 6400, 300mm, shutter 1/60). I also reviewed the shots I considered overexposed and realized I had a composure faux pas. &lt;head smack&gt; The breakfast nook light was in the frame just over my wife's shoulder which (at iso 6400) caused that corner of the pic to be blown out. It also affected the rest of the photo (a bit too light), but the focus was razor sharp. Full-frame with high ISO capability is a new world for me. I don't intend to make it harder than it is and look forward to long-term D610 education.As always, I welcome any and all comments/instruction.Merry CHRISTmas,fiVe</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fiVe, post: 232716, member: 17614"] A very enlightening response. Thank you. I checked the test pics and found that approx. half fit this shutter-speed-to-focal-length scenario. I assume the others are different because of the way the camera metered the shot. (E.g. ISO 6400, 300mm, shutter 1/60). I also reviewed the shots I considered overexposed and realized I had a composure faux pas. <head smack> The breakfast nook light was in the frame just over my wife's shoulder which (at iso 6400) caused that corner of the pic to be blown out. It also affected the rest of the photo (a bit too light), but the focus was razor sharp. Full-frame with high ISO capability is a new world for me. I don't intend to make it harder than it is and look forward to long-term D610 education. As always, I welcome any and all comments/instruction. Merry CHRISTmas, fiVe [/QUOTE]

Verification