Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wud" data-source="post: 232116" data-attributes="member: 13578">Look at these images I tested the 50mm with, on the blue flowers you can see which aperture I used. For f/16, most of the image are more or less sharp (not completely, as I focused on the flowers in front of me). For f/1.4, most are blurred out, except the thin line (dof) where my focus were: <a href="http://nikonites.com/prime/13385-they-said-sigma-better-than-nikkor-50mm-2.html#post148044" target="_blank">http://nikonites.com/prime/13385-they-said-sigma-better-than-nikkor-50mm-2.html#post148044</a>When learning how the different apertures effected my images, what I did was taking several shots of the same but with different apertures. Just to see the differences it made in the same compositions. Not every possible aperture, just a few for a period. I can really suggest this (just remember to change your shutter, when you change aperture).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wud, post: 232116, member: 13578"] Look at these images I tested the 50mm with, on the blue flowers you can see which aperture I used. For f/16, most of the image are more or less sharp (not completely, as I focused on the flowers in front of me). For f/1.4, most are blurred out, except the thin line (dof) where my focus were: [URL]http://nikonites.com/prime/13385-they-said-sigma-better-than-nikkor-50mm-2.html#post148044[/URL] When learning how the different apertures effected my images, what I did was taking several shots of the same but with different apertures. Just to see the differences it made in the same compositions. Not every possible aperture, just a few for a period. I can really suggest this (just remember to change your shutter, when you change aperture). [/QUOTE]

Verification