Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Are Fast Lenses Becoming Obsolete???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phillydog1958" data-source="post: 136057" data-attributes="member: 8704"><p>Interesting point, Jeff. I'm leaning towards your school of thought. I recently purchased the 70-200mm f4. I researched the differences between it and it's big brother -- the 2.8 version. I looked at pro reviews and user reviews. The f4 version had great reviews and the comparisons between the 2 lenses convinced me to go with the f4. Many users felt that the f4 was comparable to the 2.8, in many ways, not all. Some users said that they would even give up their 2.8 lenses for the f4 version because they felt that the f4 was almost just as good. They mentioned that the reduced size and weight made a difference to them. We all know the obvious advantages of a 2.8 over a f4. After buying the f4, I'm convinced that I can live with my decision and not have any regrets. You might be on to something . . . These new cams are impressive. Personally, I've never had the pleasure of shooting with the 2.8, so I can't compare the 2 lenses. All I can say is that $2,500 is a lot of doe for a lens. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phillydog1958, post: 136057, member: 8704"] Interesting point, Jeff. I'm leaning towards your school of thought. I recently purchased the 70-200mm f4. I researched the differences between it and it's big brother -- the 2.8 version. I looked at pro reviews and user reviews. The f4 version had great reviews and the comparisons between the 2 lenses convinced me to go with the f4. Many users felt that the f4 was comparable to the 2.8, in many ways, not all. Some users said that they would even give up their 2.8 lenses for the f4 version because they felt that the f4 was almost just as good. They mentioned that the reduced size and weight made a difference to them. We all know the obvious advantages of a 2.8 over a f4. After buying the f4, I'm convinced that I can live with my decision and not have any regrets. You might be on to something . . . These new cams are impressive. Personally, I've never had the pleasure of shooting with the 2.8, so I can't compare the 2 lenses. All I can say is that $2,500 is a lot of doe for a lens. :D. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Are Fast Lenses Becoming Obsolete???
Top