Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cwgrizz" data-source="post: 614491" data-attributes="member: 27017">[PLAIN]Re: Start/End times… [Re: APRIL 2017 Assignment:&nbsp; Unique Perspective][/PLAIN]Yes, I really think so.&nbsp; If the picture was taken at the very latest time of what is assumed to be the end of the month (last day), the camera would record Date &amp; 2359.&nbsp; If the camera recorded in the exif data 0000 it would have the first of the next month.With a month long assignment, is it really worth fussing over 59 extra seconds to take and post a photo. Ha!&nbsp; In the monthly assignments we have tried to keep it as simple as possible.&nbsp; In the weekly challenges, a little while back the time was argued in the opposite way that it shouldn't be 0000UTC, but 2359UTC for the cutoff.&nbsp; It seems to be a no win situation.&nbsp; :unconscious:After all of this typing and thinking about it, I will go ahead and change the cutoff time to 0000 UTC to keep it consistent with the weekly challenges even though that seems to be a problem there at times too. Ha!!!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cwgrizz, post: 614491, member: 27017"] [b][PLAIN]Re: Start/End times… [Re: APRIL 2017 Assignment: Unique Perspective][/PLAIN][/b] Yes, I really think so. If the picture was taken at the very latest time of what is assumed to be the end of the month (last day), the camera would record Date & 2359. If the camera recorded in the exif data 0000 it would have the first of the next month. With a month long assignment, is it really worth fussing over 59 extra seconds to take and post a photo. Ha! In the monthly assignments we have tried to keep it as simple as possible. In the weekly challenges, a little while back the time was argued in the opposite way that it shouldn't be 0000UTC, but 2359UTC for the cutoff. It seems to be a no win situation. :unconscious: After all of this typing and thinking about it, I will go ahead and change the cutoff time to 0000 UTC to keep it consistent with the weekly challenges even though that seems to be a problem there at times too. Ha!!! [/QUOTE]

Verification