Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Aperture
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 627647" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>The focal length of the lens does appear to have an impact on depth of field, with longer focal lengths having a shallower DoF. For instance a 200mm lens, focused at twelve feet will, have a wafer-thin DoF as compared to a 20mm lens focused at the same distance. However, if the subject occupies the same portion of the frame, the depth of field is essentially the same whether you're shooting with a wide-angle lens or a telephoto. Obviously you would have to move closer with a wide-angle lens or further away with a telephoto lens to maintain the same subject size. The reason longer lenses appear to produce a shallower depth of field is thanks to their narrow angle of view: compared to a wide lens a telephoto will fill the frame with a much smaller area of background, so background blur appears magnified too. Clear as mud?</p><p></p><p>I'm not really concerned about diffraction but neither have I noticed a significant improvement when stopping down to f/22. So, as a general rule, I shoot landscapes at f/11 or f/16.</p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 627647, member: 13090"] The focal length of the lens does appear to have an impact on depth of field, with longer focal lengths having a shallower DoF. For instance a 200mm lens, focused at twelve feet will, have a wafer-thin DoF as compared to a 20mm lens focused at the same distance. However, if the subject occupies the same portion of the frame, the depth of field is essentially the same whether you're shooting with a wide-angle lens or a telephoto. Obviously you would have to move closer with a wide-angle lens or further away with a telephoto lens to maintain the same subject size. The reason longer lenses appear to produce a shallower depth of field is thanks to their narrow angle of view: compared to a wide lens a telephoto will fill the frame with a much smaller area of background, so background blur appears magnified too. Clear as mud? I'm not really concerned about diffraction but neither have I noticed a significant improvement when stopping down to f/22. So, as a general rule, I shoot landscapes at f/11 or f/16. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Aperture
Top