Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 263674" data-attributes="member: 14443">I know what op wanted to hear and since im going to buy this lens my bashing is very relevant since he wants to buy it too. Im just saying it like it is. If a L canon that costs so much cant handle a little competition from an $700 lens, then they need to go back and redesign it to a mark III maybe. Because mark I and II isnt doing so well. Oh and it has 3 years warranty instead of the canons 1. Also, why does it bother you? U a canon spy on the forums? If it bothers u so much let me bring you some tissues. Wouldnt want to offend a canonist. The truth hurts. If it was the other way around I would have no issue. And you know what, iM certain the tokina also schools the nikon 17-35. But thats a 10+ old lens design. Now u see im not biased with my opinion. I say it like it is. The canon lens feels like a toy in the hand.feels like an old 18-35 3.5-4.5. Not what u expect from and $1800 lens.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 263674, member: 14443"] I know what op wanted to hear and since im going to buy this lens my bashing is very relevant since he wants to buy it too. Im just saying it like it is. If a L canon that costs so much cant handle a little competition from an $700 lens, then they need to go back and redesign it to a mark III maybe. Because mark I and II isnt doing so well. Oh and it has 3 years warranty instead of the canons 1. Also, why does it bother you? U a canon spy on the forums? If it bothers u so much let me bring you some tissues. Wouldnt want to offend a canonist. The truth hurts. If it was the other way around I would have no issue. And you know what, iM certain the tokina also schools the nikon 17-35. But thats a 10+ old lens design. Now u see im not biased with my opinion. I say it like it is. The canon lens feels like a toy in the hand.feels like an old 18-35 3.5-4.5. Not what u expect from and $1800 lens. [/QUOTE]

Verification