Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Eye-level" data-source="post: 77329" data-attributes="member: 6548">I have finally come to the conclusion that with the 2000 dollar price point (I'm hearing reports that in places like Australia the camera is significantly more expensive...like 2500 which is weird) FX is still a little to expensive for mass consumption.  I'd wait till next year sometime to see if the price falls to 1500-1800.  The D7K is a THOUSAND dollars cheaper folks!  Is FX really worth that grand?  Think of all the different pro level lenses you could put on a D7K for a grand.  I think we will yet see a replacement for the D300 although perhaps not until next year.I'll pass on this one...2K is close but no cigar for me and I bet for a ton of other folks too.  1500 and it would have been a runaway.</blockquote>