Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Any opinions on Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 vs 70-300mm f/4-5.6 ED?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BF Hammer" data-source="post: 752891" data-attributes="member: 48483"><p>Cindy, it really is the series 1 that preceded. But the price was very right at $700. KEH is selling used Series VRII at over $1000 at this point. But I do understand the VR is better on later lenses, and image quality is a bit nicer on series VRII.</p><p></p><p>For my specific situation, I am filling a niche between my Nikon 24-120mm f/4 and a Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3C. The fit feels right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BF Hammer, post: 752891, member: 48483"] Cindy, it really is the series 1 that preceded. But the price was very right at $700. KEH is selling used Series VRII at over $1000 at this point. But I do understand the VR is better on later lenses, and image quality is a bit nicer on series VRII. For my specific situation, I am filling a niche between my Nikon 24-120mm f/4 and a Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3C. The fit feels right. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Any opinions on Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 vs 70-300mm f/4-5.6 ED?
Top
