Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
An Unlikely "Love Affair"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ohkphoto" data-source="post: 194011" data-attributes="member: 1573"><p>LOL what fun comments to wake up to . . . you sweet guys. "Though ye jest, 'tis still fun to hear." <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]50917[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Thank you all for your very valuable feedback, and based on all of it, here are my conclusions. </p><p></p><p>The problem I had with the photo was a "center of interest" issue. (@Whitelight: you saw this, and your comment about the art blocking the windows was the first clue that this was not working) Because I'm not a "car person" I didn't realize how beautiful the car really was. It really demanded to be the center of interest . . . I foolishly tried to make the reflection the center of interest, which is why part of the car is out of the frame. This morning, I even tried to reduce the brightness of the car to highlight the reflection in the window more and force the eyes to travel to the reflection first . . . no go. So, if I have Angelina Jolie or George Clooney (or the "salad dressing" man) in the viewfinder, why in the world would I want the reflection to be the center of interest?</p><p></p><p>I like the second crop simply because the original looks "sloppy" . . . and the teepee in the background is as bothersome as the headlight being cut out of the photo. Sometimes, if something is missing, it's better to make it "obvious".</p><p></p><p>I agree with all of you that the filter treatment in the second one detracts from the car . . . draws the eyes either toward the center glare or the bumper and rims.</p><p></p><p>On my next trip to town, I'm going to seek out this car and give it the "photographic respect" it deserves <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p>Thank you again for helping me become a little more introspective . . . . have gotten sloppy with that, too, . . . sigh.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ohkphoto, post: 194011, member: 1573"] LOL what fun comments to wake up to . . . you sweet guys. "Though ye jest, 'tis still fun to hear." :cool: [ATTACH=CONFIG]50917._xfImport[/ATTACH] Thank you all for your very valuable feedback, and based on all of it, here are my conclusions. The problem I had with the photo was a "center of interest" issue. (@Whitelight: you saw this, and your comment about the art blocking the windows was the first clue that this was not working) Because I'm not a "car person" I didn't realize how beautiful the car really was. It really demanded to be the center of interest . . . I foolishly tried to make the reflection the center of interest, which is why part of the car is out of the frame. This morning, I even tried to reduce the brightness of the car to highlight the reflection in the window more and force the eyes to travel to the reflection first . . . no go. So, if I have Angelina Jolie or George Clooney (or the "salad dressing" man) in the viewfinder, why in the world would I want the reflection to be the center of interest? I like the second crop simply because the original looks "sloppy" . . . and the teepee in the background is as bothersome as the headlight being cut out of the photo. Sometimes, if something is missing, it's better to make it "obvious". I agree with all of you that the filter treatment in the second one detracts from the car . . . draws the eyes either toward the center glare or the bumper and rims. On my next trip to town, I'm going to seek out this car and give it the "photographic respect" it deserves :cool: Thank you again for helping me become a little more introspective . . . . have gotten sloppy with that, too, . . . sigh. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
An Unlikely "Love Affair"
Top