Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 292140" data-attributes="member: 9240">I was going to call you on cheating since the plane was meant to challenge your ghost reduction and not ghost elimination, but all I said was you had to deal with it.&nbsp; I just never expected you to go all Malaysia Airlines on it. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />Your second sentence is exactly what this exercise is all about.&nbsp; &quot;Bad exposures&quot; and &quot;bad lighting&quot; don't necessarily mean you've lost an image.&nbsp; Sometimes you just need to work harder.&nbsp; Not a lot of people want to resort to HDR to capture scenes with wildly varying lighting, and the truth is that in a lot of them they don't have to if they know how to get a good initial exposure to work from.&nbsp; The histogram is your friend.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 292140, member: 9240"] I was going to call you on cheating since the plane was meant to challenge your ghost reduction and not ghost elimination, but all I said was you had to deal with it. I just never expected you to go all Malaysia Airlines on it. ;) Your second sentence is [I]exactly[/I] what this exercise is all about. "Bad exposures" and "bad lighting" don't necessarily mean you've lost an image. Sometimes you just need to work harder. Not a lot of people want to resort to HDR to capture scenes with wildly varying lighting, and the truth is that in a lot of them they don't have to if they know how to get a good initial exposure to work from. The histogram is your friend. [/QUOTE]

Verification