Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 478363" data-attributes="member: 12496">Not &quot;normal&quot;, but I think aliasing is always possible, in rare events.&nbsp; We do sometimes see it in men's coats in TV news (notice that the anchor guy will never wear a patterned coat).&nbsp; It is just something that happens in digital images sometimes, when the subject detail is finer than the camera sensor can resolve. &nbsp;No, I have not had much trouble with the D800 (it has 36 megapixels, a little higher resolution sampling).&nbsp; A few cameras have no anti-alaising filter now&nbsp; (D810 36 mp FX or D7200 24 mp DX, both a little higher resolution sampling than 24mp FX).&nbsp; It was more problem when we had 12 megapixels or less. The D610 has a filter, but I have heard it's&nbsp; a little &quot;weaker anti-aliasing filter, but I know no details.I cannot say that I see the aliasing in your first two pictures.It can also happen in the computer, so I still wonder if you can see this in the original image from the camera, when viewed at 100% size (zoomed to 100%).If you don't (which I think it is very possible that you don't), then it is not at all an issue with the camera sampling, but instead due to later sampling.&nbsp; If concerned, that's the first thing to check.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 478363, member: 12496"] Not "normal", but I think aliasing is always possible, in rare events. We do sometimes see it in men's coats in TV news (notice that the anchor guy will never wear a patterned coat). It is just something that happens in digital images sometimes, when the subject detail is finer than the camera sensor can resolve. No, I have not had much trouble with the D800 (it has 36 megapixels, a little higher resolution sampling). A few cameras have no anti-alaising filter now (D810 36 mp FX or D7200 24 mp DX, both a little higher resolution sampling than 24mp FX). It was more problem when we had 12 megapixels or less. The D610 has a filter, but I have heard it's a little "weaker anti-aliasing filter, but I know no details. I cannot say that I see the aliasing in your first two pictures. It can also happen in the computer, so I still wonder if you can see this in the original image from the camera, when viewed at 100% size (zoomed to 100%). If you don't (which I think it is very possible that you don't), then it is not at all an issue with the camera sampling, but instead due to later sampling. If concerned, that's the first thing to check. [/QUOTE]

Verification