Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Advice please on the 24-70....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 492817" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>DxO? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> You have to understand that I'm one of those that totally ignore DxO. I think I would prefer actual real tests... with meaningful numbers that can be compared.</p><p></p><p>Here's a summary of people that think like me:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=dxo+reliability" target="_blank">dxo reliability - Google Search</a></p><p></p><p>It should not even be a question, much less a popular opinion.</p><p></p><p>I'm speaking of DxO, and I have nothing against the Tamron, I even own one different Tamron. I imagine they are all a good deal for the price. But I'm really pleased with my Nikon Trinity. </p><p></p><p>But not imagining that the DxO test really could actually be that bad, I had to check for myself. I see very different numbers than you mention. They are just DxO numbers, and yes, they do still see things no one else does, and we really don't know what those things are, or why they do it, but perhaps you put the Nikon version on a DX body with few megapixels, or something? They are not really testing lenses.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare/Side-by-side/AF-S-Nikkor-24-70mm-f-2.8G-ED-on-Nikon-D800-versus-Tamron-SP-24-70mm-F28-Di-VC-USD-Nikon-on-Nikon-D800__175_792_885_792" target="_blank">Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED on Nikon D800 versus Tamron SP 24-70mm F2.8 Di VC USD Nikon on Nikon D800 - Side by side lens comparison - DxOMark</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 492817, member: 12496"] DxO? :) You have to understand that I'm one of those that totally ignore DxO. I think I would prefer actual real tests... with meaningful numbers that can be compared. Here's a summary of people that think like me: [URL="http://www.google.com/search?q=dxo+reliability"]dxo reliability - Google Search[/URL] It should not even be a question, much less a popular opinion. I'm speaking of DxO, and I have nothing against the Tamron, I even own one different Tamron. I imagine they are all a good deal for the price. But I'm really pleased with my Nikon Trinity. But not imagining that the DxO test really could actually be that bad, I had to check for myself. I see very different numbers than you mention. They are just DxO numbers, and yes, they do still see things no one else does, and we really don't know what those things are, or why they do it, but perhaps you put the Nikon version on a DX body with few megapixels, or something? They are not really testing lenses. [URL="http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare/Side-by-side/AF-S-Nikkor-24-70mm-f-2.8G-ED-on-Nikon-D800-versus-Tamron-SP-24-70mm-F28-Di-VC-USD-Nikon-on-Nikon-D800__175_792_885_792"]Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED on Nikon D800 versus Tamron SP 24-70mm F2.8 Di VC USD Nikon on Nikon D800 - Side by side lens comparison - DxOMark[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Advice please on the 24-70....
Top