Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Advice on lens selection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stix" data-source="post: 118005" data-attributes="member: 12913"><p>Judging from the replies, I may be alone here...</p><p></p><p>Not long after getting my 1st dslr (Canon XS), I realized another lens or two would be a neccesity. </p><p>A year later I sold my Canon stuff and bought a D3100. Back to square one.</p><p> </p><p>I've learned some things, but the same question exists...which lens to buy? </p><p>The main issue is...I like to shoot everything; action,landscape,micro,portrait, but I gravitate toward low-light shots; sunrise/sunsets/night skies. </p><p>My budget does not allow for the collection of glass needed to cover all the bases. Especially my need for "fast" glass (ie:expensive). I won't be happy until I invest in at least one fast lens, but no idea what focal length would be best, or if I should go with a prime or zoom. </p><p>Too many questions, not enough (clear) answers. </p><p></p><p>I was surprised by all the (cheap) glass, that had good user reviews. Most will not AF on my cam. I shoot all manual 95% of the time, so no big deal. I don't know any way to "test drive" lenses, so I decided to take a chance. </p><p>I have 3 lenses; the 18-55 VR kit lens, a Tamron 55-200 DiII and a Sigma 70-300 macro. I have less than $150. in the two non-nikon's, and confident I can re-sell both with minimum loss. I actually made money on the last (non-AF) Tamron I sold. </p><p>From what I've read here, most have a very dim view of these lenses. For me, they provide a way to narrow down (exactly) what I want in a lens, without major investment. </p><p>In a zoom, I like the reach of 300mm, but most start at 70mm. Will I miss the range of 55-70mm? Judging from my exif data, I don't shoot much in that range...one question down. </p><p></p><p>So whats my point here??? Google "which lens to buy?" and you're headed for a severe case of info overload! </p><p>Many will tell you...invest in good glass, I agree. But now you're facing a huge selection of lenses, minimum cost of $400.-500...minimum! To some of us, thats a chunk of change for a purchase we're not confident on. </p><p>My personal experience...these cheap lenses are a great way to experiment without breaking the bank. </p><p>I shoot manual and often use a tripod, so I don't miss VR or AF. I've had good experience with re-sell, been surprised by their image quality, have different lenses to play with and can afford to swap gear! </p><p>Still undecided on a faster lens, but will continue this course. It seems to be working for me. </p><p> * Note to newbies...be careful with your info sources. I've run into (alot) of "equipment snobs". To them, if you aren't using a full frame camera with primo glass and a $400. tripod...you're wasting your time. </p><p></p><p>I do believe in good equipment, (as with anything) it makes a difference. </p><p>I also believe great images CAN be produced on a budget.</p><p>...my $.02</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stix, post: 118005, member: 12913"] Judging from the replies, I may be alone here... Not long after getting my 1st dslr (Canon XS), I realized another lens or two would be a neccesity. A year later I sold my Canon stuff and bought a D3100. Back to square one. I've learned some things, but the same question exists...which lens to buy? The main issue is...I like to shoot everything; action,landscape,micro,portrait, but I gravitate toward low-light shots; sunrise/sunsets/night skies. My budget does not allow for the collection of glass needed to cover all the bases. Especially my need for "fast" glass (ie:expensive). I won't be happy until I invest in at least one fast lens, but no idea what focal length would be best, or if I should go with a prime or zoom. Too many questions, not enough (clear) answers. I was surprised by all the (cheap) glass, that had good user reviews. Most will not AF on my cam. I shoot all manual 95% of the time, so no big deal. I don't know any way to "test drive" lenses, so I decided to take a chance. I have 3 lenses; the 18-55 VR kit lens, a Tamron 55-200 DiII and a Sigma 70-300 macro. I have less than $150. in the two non-nikon's, and confident I can re-sell both with minimum loss. I actually made money on the last (non-AF) Tamron I sold. From what I've read here, most have a very dim view of these lenses. For me, they provide a way to narrow down (exactly) what I want in a lens, without major investment. In a zoom, I like the reach of 300mm, but most start at 70mm. Will I miss the range of 55-70mm? Judging from my exif data, I don't shoot much in that range...one question down. So whats my point here??? Google "which lens to buy?" and you're headed for a severe case of info overload! Many will tell you...invest in good glass, I agree. But now you're facing a huge selection of lenses, minimum cost of $400.-500...minimum! To some of us, thats a chunk of change for a purchase we're not confident on. My personal experience...these cheap lenses are a great way to experiment without breaking the bank. I shoot manual and often use a tripod, so I don't miss VR or AF. I've had good experience with re-sell, been surprised by their image quality, have different lenses to play with and can afford to swap gear! Still undecided on a faster lens, but will continue this course. It seems to be working for me. * Note to newbies...be careful with your info sources. I've run into (alot) of "equipment snobs". To them, if you aren't using a full frame camera with primo glass and a $400. tripod...you're wasting your time. I do believe in good equipment, (as with anything) it makes a difference. I also believe great images CAN be produced on a budget. ...my $.02 [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Advice on lens selection
Top