Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="egosbar" data-source="post: 273600" data-attributes="member: 19871">you can get the 1.8 for a little over 100 bucks , i have one and its the best value , what lenses do you have now , if you have the 18-55 then i wouldnt buy the 18-105 id be buying the 55-300 if you dont have one its a great lens for the money as well.i notice there is mention you have the 18-55 and 55-200 which i cant see mention but if you have them&nbsp; i dont see the need too get the 18-105 you already have them covered , id go the 50mm for sure then look at a couple im looking at belowim shooting with 18-55 landscapes and 55-300 action etc&nbsp; , i also have the 1.8 50mm for low light my next lens im torn between a 105mm micro as i do want too shoot macro or a tokina 11-16 wide&nbsp; , really struggling for choice but leaning towards a macro at the moment , in the end ill probably own both which will complete what i needlist the lenses you already have and the type of shooting you will be doing</blockquote>

[QUOTE="egosbar, post: 273600, member: 19871"] you can get the 1.8 for a little over 100 bucks , i have one and its the best value , what lenses do you have now , if you have the 18-55 then i wouldnt buy the 18-105 id be buying the 55-300 if you dont have one its a great lens for the money as well. i notice there is mention you have the 18-55 and 55-200 which i cant see mention but if you have them i dont see the need too get the 18-105 you already have them covered , id go the 50mm for sure then look at a couple im looking at below im shooting with 18-55 landscapes and 55-300 action etc , i also have the 1.8 50mm for low light my next lens im torn between a 105mm micro as i do want too shoot macro or a tokina 11-16 wide , really struggling for choice but leaning towards a macro at the moment , in the end ill probably own both which will complete what i need list the lenses you already have and the type of shooting you will be doing [/QUOTE]

Verification