Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Adobe RGB vs. sRGB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 684017" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>Thank you to everyone for your thoughts. I noticed something which I will mention below Nick's comment.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When I posted both photos here last night, I couldn't tell any difference other than the watermark shifted slightly (added them by hand with a brush). Then when I went through Tapatalk on my iPhone, I could see a difference. When I have time, I will take a screen shot to show the differences. It even listed the bytes which were slightly different.</p><p></p><p>This laptop displays 75% sRGB and only 56% Adobe RGB according to my Spyder's calibration. Even when comparing the files directly, they appear to be identical. However, since there is enough of a striking Tapatalk difference, I am going to change my workflow somehow. I prefer working in Adobe RGB simply because I get less clipping. When I checked the clipping between both files, the Adobe RGB had only a tiny amount of white clipping. I fixed those areas individually with a brush before posting. Fortunately I didn't have the issue with clipping blacks. That's been the biggest pain in the butt for me when working in sRGB and the main reason why I switched to Adobe RGB.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 684017, member: 13196"] Thank you to everyone for your thoughts. I noticed something which I will mention below Nick's comment. When I posted both photos here last night, I couldn't tell any difference other than the watermark shifted slightly (added them by hand with a brush). Then when I went through Tapatalk on my iPhone, I could see a difference. When I have time, I will take a screen shot to show the differences. It even listed the bytes which were slightly different. This laptop displays 75% sRGB and only 56% Adobe RGB according to my Spyder's calibration. Even when comparing the files directly, they appear to be identical. However, since there is enough of a striking Tapatalk difference, I am going to change my workflow somehow. I prefer working in Adobe RGB simply because I get less clipping. When I checked the clipping between both files, the Adobe RGB had only a tiny amount of white clipping. I fixed those areas individually with a brush before posting. Fortunately I didn't have the issue with clipping blacks. That's been the biggest pain in the butt for me when working in sRGB and the main reason why I switched to Adobe RGB. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Adobe RGB vs. sRGB
Top