Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Adobe RAW image processing (LR & ACR)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Danno_RIP" data-source="post: 518556" data-attributes="member: 34269"><p>Forgive me for the question if this is redundant, but this type of discussion is difficult for me and I want to make sure I am understanding the direct impact. I can get rapped around the axle very quickly these days and this is the kind of discussions that will do it very quickly... dian bramage is annoying... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I read the article and the posts a couple times and I see how the bug could impact looking at two different cameras, and I do see, based on the discussion, that you could cull some pictures you shouldn't in the initial review, and I have already set my import defaults to match my camera and added some of the other lens correction items etc... (I learned about them in a course I took). </p><p></p><p>My struggle in reading this is does is understanding the impact. Is it that I should be careful what I delete initially because I could be missing something good... or is it that LR is messing things up so much it increases my post processing effort and there are better conversion tools that will make me faster and more accurate. </p><p></p><p>I just love this stuff, but I really struggle with this kind of in depth discussions. And to think I used to be an engineer that worked on configuration tools... oh well.. </p><p></p><p>I hope this does not come off as flippant... I really just am trying to understand it better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Danno_RIP, post: 518556, member: 34269"] Forgive me for the question if this is redundant, but this type of discussion is difficult for me and I want to make sure I am understanding the direct impact. I can get rapped around the axle very quickly these days and this is the kind of discussions that will do it very quickly... dian bramage is annoying... :) I read the article and the posts a couple times and I see how the bug could impact looking at two different cameras, and I do see, based on the discussion, that you could cull some pictures you shouldn't in the initial review, and I have already set my import defaults to match my camera and added some of the other lens correction items etc... (I learned about them in a course I took). My struggle in reading this is does is understanding the impact. Is it that I should be careful what I delete initially because I could be missing something good... or is it that LR is messing things up so much it increases my post processing effort and there are better conversion tools that will make me faster and more accurate. I just love this stuff, but I really struggle with this kind of in depth discussions. And to think I used to be an engineer that worked on configuration tools... oh well.. I hope this does not come off as flippant... I really just am trying to understand it better. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Adobe RAW image processing (LR & ACR)
Top