Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
acquiring more lenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 797421" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">Probably the biggest drawback I see to DX is the fact that since it is a smaller sensor, the corresponding focal lengths are equally shorter. Shorter focal length means deeper depth of field and that means sharper and more distracting backgrounds. If shooting outside, the lens I reach for most frequently is my 180mm f/2.8 ED Nikkor. It is sharp as a razor even at f/4 and it renders the background way out of focus. It also has a very nice and smooth bokeh. For areas where I have lots of space and can stand off from the subject at greater differences, my 300mm f/2.8 ED IF AIS Nikkor is ideal. At f/4 it is very sharp and the depth of field for a full length portrait is about a foot or so deep. It is heavy but I still have no problems hand holding it but use tripod if the light levels are lower. That throws the background completely out of focus. </span></span></span></p><p></p><p>This is an example of how using a long focal length lens can completely separate the subject from the background without losing a sense of place</p><p></p><p><a href="http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17025172&size=lg" target="_blank">Victoria: Photo by Photographer Scott Murphy - photo.net</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 797421, member: 12827"] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]Probably the biggest drawback I see to DX is the fact that since it is a smaller sensor, the corresponding focal lengths are equally shorter. Shorter focal length means deeper depth of field and that means sharper and more distracting backgrounds. If shooting outside, the lens I reach for most frequently is my 180mm f/2.8 ED Nikkor. It is sharp as a razor even at f/4 and it renders the background way out of focus. It also has a very nice and smooth bokeh. For areas where I have lots of space and can stand off from the subject at greater differences, my 300mm f/2.8 ED IF AIS Nikkor is ideal. At f/4 it is very sharp and the depth of field for a full length portrait is about a foot or so deep. It is heavy but I still have no problems hand holding it but use tripod if the light levels are lower. That throws the background completely out of focus. [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] This is an example of how using a long focal length lens can completely separate the subject from the background without losing a sense of place [URL="http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17025172&size=lg"]Victoria: Photo by Photographer Scott Murphy - photo.net[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
acquiring more lenses
Top