Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dclock" data-source="post: 848013" data-attributes="member: 71425">Thank you for your reply.&nbsp; I believe the 3 legged is designed specifically for the camera. By the pictures it has the anti-twist pins.Glad to hear, as the Leofoto is less expensive.What I (thought) I liked about 3 legged was that it did not extend over the battery hatch at all. Interesting comment about stable base to set the camera down on though.Another thing I liked about 3 legged was that it was all one piece, which I think must surely be more rigid and stable. But that's what has me worried about access to the mc-dc2 port. I can see from pictures that the port itself is accessible, but the whole plug would have to fit in there. The extendable brackets should solve the port access. Do you think they're still rigid/sturdy enough?Edit: I just learned about the ML-L7 bluetooth remote, usable with the z6iii, that will obviate my concerns about the MC-DC2.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dclock, post: 848013, member: 71425"] Thank you for your reply. I believe the 3 legged is designed specifically for the camera. By the pictures it has the anti-twist pins. Glad to hear, as the Leofoto is less expensive. What I (thought) I liked about 3 legged was that it did not extend over the battery hatch at all. Interesting comment about stable base to set the camera down on though. Another thing I liked about 3 legged was that it was all one piece, which I think must surely be more rigid and stable. But that's what has me worried about access to the mc-dc2 port. I can see from pictures that the port itself is accessible, but the whole plug would have to fit in there. The extendable brackets should solve the port access. Do you think they're still rigid/sturdy enough? Edit: I just learned about the ML-L7 bluetooth remote, usable with the z6iii, that will obviate my concerns about the MC-DC2. [/QUOTE]

Verification