Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
About the Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G • All versions vs 85mm ƒ1.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 181206" data-attributes="member: 4399"><p>I owned both and since have sold the 85 for the reasons Kodiak has stated. If I need a shorter focal length for portraits the 70-200 f4 works very well. The 105 2.8g serves many purposes, more than just macro. I went on a nature walk today with the family and carried only the 105. Shot everything from family, flowers, macro to landscapes, It's the most flexible lens I own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rick M, post: 181206, member: 4399"] I owned both and since have sold the 85 for the reasons Kodiak has stated. If I need a shorter focal length for portraits the 70-200 f4 works very well. The 105 2.8g serves many purposes, more than just macro. I went on a nature walk today with the family and carried only the 105. Shot everything from family, flowers, macro to landscapes, It's the most flexible lens I own. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
About the Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G • All versions vs 85mm ƒ1.8
Top
