Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
a quick comparison between the nikon and tamron 17-35
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="480sparky" data-source="post: 274443" data-attributes="member: 15805"><p>I don't concern myself with AF noise, distortion, exact focal length, etc. I'm testing for <em>sharpness</em>, which is what is paramount for my work. Distortion can be corrected in post, but a lens that controls it better makes for less work for every shot that needs corrected.</p><p></p><p>I really don't care that a supposed 17mm lens is actually 17.85439856mm. Nor f/4 is actually f/3.984758663.</p><p></p><p>I don't shoot brick walls, newspapers, test charts, etc. I shoot my back yard. I test every full aperture and every focal length marked on the barrel. I then pixel-peep the results at 100% and make what is purely a judgement call. Nothing scientific about it.</p><p></p><p>Here's one sample result, that for my Nikkor 24-120 f/4:</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc172/480sparky/Photography%202/SweetSpot.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>The top left of the pair of numbers is <u>my judgement</u> of the center sharpness, and lower right of the pair is the corner. I color-code the backgrounds based on the numbers, making the focal length/f-stop combo green as a first choice, blue as a second choice, orange as a last result, and red means avoid if at all possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="480sparky, post: 274443, member: 15805"] I don't concern myself with AF noise, distortion, exact focal length, etc. I'm testing for [I]sharpness[/I], which is what is paramount for my work. Distortion can be corrected in post, but a lens that controls it better makes for less work for every shot that needs corrected. I really don't care that a supposed 17mm lens is actually 17.85439856mm. Nor f/4 is actually f/3.984758663. I don't shoot brick walls, newspapers, test charts, etc. I shoot my back yard. I test every full aperture and every focal length marked on the barrel. I then pixel-peep the results at 100% and make what is purely a judgement call. Nothing scientific about it. Here's one sample result, that for my Nikkor 24-120 f/4: [IMG]http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc172/480sparky/Photography%202/SweetSpot.jpg[/IMG] The top left of the pair of numbers is [U]my judgement[/U] of the center sharpness, and lower right of the pair is the corner. I color-code the backgrounds based on the numbers, making the focal length/f-stop combo green as a first choice, blue as a second choice, orange as a last result, and red means avoid if at all possible. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
a quick comparison between the nikon and tamron 17-35
Top