Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
a quick comparison between the nikon and tamron 17-35
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 274439" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>ill do some tests as soon as I get a chance. I will just do a basic brick wall test. nothing more. I will shoot at 2.8/4/5.6/8. 17/24/35mm. dont care for flare and distortion can be seen on the brick wall. af was quick on both. while the nikon is silent the tamron is quite quiet even though it uses the camera motor. it has the same tone as the 50 1.8d but its very quiet. not an annoying sound at all. should I keep the tripod in the same space for both? or should I compose the picture so both are identical frame wise?</p><p> then we can see the true focal lengths.. what distance should I shoot? should I keep it the same for all 3 focal lengths? not sure which is better and dont ask for both. Im not down for shooting tons and tons of frames haha.</p><p></p><p>what surprises me in these tests is the tamron being shot from further away has much more detail then with the nikon which is closer and should have more micro detail. like when I do a face shot with the 85/105 vs half body or full body shot. forget the corners with both. they both suck A. but im talking about contrast and sharpness. I think I just got a very good copy. well we know QC in 3rd party lenses is a mixed bag. </p><p>should I check his lens for focus fine tune? ill just</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 274439, member: 14443"] ill do some tests as soon as I get a chance. I will just do a basic brick wall test. nothing more. I will shoot at 2.8/4/5.6/8. 17/24/35mm. dont care for flare and distortion can be seen on the brick wall. af was quick on both. while the nikon is silent the tamron is quite quiet even though it uses the camera motor. it has the same tone as the 50 1.8d but its very quiet. not an annoying sound at all. should I keep the tripod in the same space for both? or should I compose the picture so both are identical frame wise? then we can see the true focal lengths.. what distance should I shoot? should I keep it the same for all 3 focal lengths? not sure which is better and dont ask for both. Im not down for shooting tons and tons of frames haha. what surprises me in these tests is the tamron being shot from further away has much more detail then with the nikon which is closer and should have more micro detail. like when I do a face shot with the 85/105 vs half body or full body shot. forget the corners with both. they both suck A. but im talking about contrast and sharpness. I think I just got a very good copy. well we know QC in 3rd party lenses is a mixed bag. should I check his lens for focus fine tune? ill just [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
a quick comparison between the nikon and tamron 17-35
Top