Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="§am" data-source="post: 83787" data-attributes="member: 9187">I'd get the 55-200mm (or 55-300 if you really think you'll need the extra reach), followed by the 50mm prime.After that, you'll have a good range of lenses to learn with, and you can then decide whether you really need the 40mm or the fisheye lenses too <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I have the 55-200 and am yet to find a situation where I've wished I had a reach up to 300mm... sometimes moving a little closer has helped, most of the time I've not even gone beyond 150mm probably.It will all depend on what you end up photographing the most <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="§am, post: 83787, member: 9187"] I'd get the 55-200mm (or 55-300 if you really think you'll need the extra reach), followed by the 50mm prime. After that, you'll have a good range of lenses to learn with, and you can then decide whether you really need the 40mm or the fisheye lenses too :) I have the 55-200 and am yet to find a situation where I've wished I had a reach up to 300mm... sometimes moving a little closer has helped, most of the time I've not even gone beyond 150mm probably. It will all depend on what you end up photographing the most :) [/QUOTE]

Verification