Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SkvLTD" data-source="post: 476062" data-attributes="member: 12855">There are tons of other sites though. Rock basically says the SAME thing&nbsp; about EVERY/other lens. 18-55 kit is good/plenty for most people&nbsp; according to him.....<a href="https://photographylife.com/lenses/nikon-micro-nikkor-auto-55mm-f3-5" target="_blank">https://photographylife.com/lenses/nikon-micro-nikkor-auto-55mm-f3-5</a><a href="http://www.throughthefmount.com/articles_rev_55.html" target="_blank">through the Nikon F-Mount - Nikon Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 review and recommendations for accessories</a>Honestly&nbsp; only bad glass Nikon made were, arguably, the E-series plasticy&nbsp; consumer lenses, but given their prices the IQ was actually solid. That&nbsp; said, older non-major-major brand glass was only real bad glass, still&nbsp; with enough gems in the midst.50/2 is the roach of Nikon glass&nbsp; today, but its absolutely fine across the board. I'd really worry more&nbsp; about the body than the glass.And lastly, where are YOU looking that 50/1.2s are $300+?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SkvLTD, post: 476062, member: 12855"] There are tons of other sites though. Rock basically says the SAME thing about EVERY/other lens. 18-55 kit is good/plenty for most people according to him..... [url]https://photographylife.com/lenses/nikon-micro-nikkor-auto-55mm-f3-5[/url] [url=http://www.throughthefmount.com/articles_rev_55.html]through the Nikon F-Mount - Nikon Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 review and recommendations for accessories[/url] Honestly only bad glass Nikon made were, arguably, the E-series plasticy consumer lenses, but given their prices the IQ was actually solid. That said, older non-major-major brand glass was only real bad glass, still with enough gems in the midst. 50/2 is the roach of Nikon glass today, but its absolutely fine across the board. I'd really worry more about the body than the glass. And lastly, where are YOU looking that 50/1.2s are $300+? [/QUOTE]

Verification