Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
A good article on equivalent focal length and field of view
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 165234" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>I found an article a few months ago on Photographylife.com. It is a very well written article and explains very comprehensively the subject matter. I used the article as reference in one of my blog posts. Within the article, it explains how and why a DX sensor "ignores" light/information coming from the lens and the fact that nothing is really "cropped". </p><p>I don't get a lot of comments on my blog and to be honest with you, it is not really what I am looking for. When I do get a comment, I am always happy to reply. However, when it is a nasty comment like the one I got this morning, I trash it and move on with my day with a smile. </p><p>The comment I received was from a former member of this site and who has started his own forum. The comment he made was not in regards to my blog post. It was in regards to something I had written on here about DX sensors "ignoring" information and nothing is really "cropped". Perhaps a bad choice of words looking at it now. Though, I don't understand people who go out of their way to be nasty about an honest misuse of words.</p><p>Therefore, I will share the article with all of you and you be the judge.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://photographylife.com/equivalent-focal-length-and-field-of-view" target="_blank">Equivalent Focal Length and Field of View</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AC016, post: 165234, member: 9619"] I found an article a few months ago on Photographylife.com. It is a very well written article and explains very comprehensively the subject matter. I used the article as reference in one of my blog posts. Within the article, it explains how and why a DX sensor "ignores" light/information coming from the lens and the fact that nothing is really "cropped". I don't get a lot of comments on my blog and to be honest with you, it is not really what I am looking for. When I do get a comment, I am always happy to reply. However, when it is a nasty comment like the one I got this morning, I trash it and move on with my day with a smile. The comment I received was from a former member of this site and who has started his own forum. The comment he made was not in regards to my blog post. It was in regards to something I had written on here about DX sensors "ignoring" information and nothing is really "cropped". Perhaps a bad choice of words looking at it now. Though, I don't understand people who go out of their way to be nasty about an honest misuse of words. Therefore, I will share the article with all of you and you be the judge. [url=http://photographylife.com/equivalent-focal-length-and-field-of-view]Equivalent Focal Length and Field of View[/url] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
A good article on equivalent focal length and field of view
Top