Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blacktop" data-source="post: 603738" data-attributes="member: 22693">I don't understand how you came up with this . Are you saying that these shots were cropped 50% or more, or that they will need to be cropped that much . Looking at the Exif, the shots were taken at a 140 and a 170 mm.Assuming that the OP used a 70-200 mm ,it tells me that he had some room left to zoom in further.Also there seems to be some more room left to get in closer with the feet as well.Also, the OP perhaps can not run around anymore like when he was in his twenties to keep up with the action on the field.The only thing that I can conclude (and it's only my opinion) that the OP perhaps needs a longer lens, which has absolutely nothing to do with this camera that we are talking about.About the control, that is a matter of taste and what you are comfortable with. I myself see advantages in both style of layout.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blacktop, post: 603738, member: 22693"] I don't understand how you came up with this . Are you saying that these shots were cropped 50% or more, or that they will need to be cropped that much . Looking at the Exif, the shots were taken at a 140 and a 170 mm. Assuming that the OP used a 70-200 mm ,it tells me that he had some room left to zoom in further. Also there seems to be some more room left to get in closer with the feet as well. Also, the OP perhaps can not run around anymore like when he was in his twenties to keep up with the action on the field. The only thing that I can conclude (and it's only my opinion) that the OP perhaps needs a longer lens, which has absolutely nothing to do with this camera that we are talking about. About the control, that is a matter of taste and what you are comfortable with. I myself see advantages in both style of layout. [/QUOTE]

Verification