Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
A 46 MP DSLR??? Crazy!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TedG954" data-source="post: 81024" data-attributes="member: 9701"><p>If you actually, and <u>sincerely</u>, <em>require </em>more than 12MP, then you should probably be able to write off your equipment as a business expense. </p><p></p><p>Buying <em>what you can</em>, versus <em>what you need</em>, is what the jumbo MP crowd is appealing to. Other than a professional billboard photographer, who would need 46MP, yet alone 64MP? If you have a $30,000 lens, then the <em>need</em> has no relevance. Obviously, money is no object and the competition requires you to grab every advantage you can. Is that you? Are you a successful professional that budgets for equipment? If you're not successful, a new camera with more MP isn't going to make you solvent.</p><p></p><p>It's easy to get caught up in the race. The D600 is a good bargain and has more resolution than I'll <em>ever</em> need in my entire life. </p><p></p><p>I'm a hobby oriented photographer. If I made money using a camera, I might be able to justify 24MP. After that, it's just <em>"mine's bigger than yours"</em>. </p><p></p><p>Actual photo <em>results</em> are what count. Not the equipment you can afford.</p><p></p><p>Be sure to read my disclaimer below.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TedG954, post: 81024, member: 9701"] If you actually, and [U]sincerely[/U], [I]require [/I]more than 12MP, then you should probably be able to write off your equipment as a business expense. Buying [I]what you can[/I], versus [I]what you need[/I], is what the jumbo MP crowd is appealing to. Other than a professional billboard photographer, who would need 46MP, yet alone 64MP? If you have a $30,000 lens, then the [I]need[/I] has no relevance. Obviously, money is no object and the competition requires you to grab every advantage you can. Is that you? Are you a successful professional that budgets for equipment? If you're not successful, a new camera with more MP isn't going to make you solvent. It's easy to get caught up in the race. The D600 is a good bargain and has more resolution than I'll [I]ever[/I] need in my entire life. I'm a hobby oriented photographer. If I made money using a camera, I might be able to justify 24MP. After that, it's just [I]"mine's bigger than yours"[/I]. Actual photo [I]results[/I] are what count. Not the equipment you can afford. Be sure to read my disclaimer below. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
A 46 MP DSLR??? Crazy!!
Top