Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D800/D800E
800 or 800E ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jwstl" data-source="post: 191165" data-attributes="member: 12977"><p>For landscapes I'd stick with the D800 over the E. By all accounts, the E only shows the increased resolution at apertures around 5.6 and wider. Most landscapes are shot at f/8 and higher where there's little difference between the 2 cameras.</p><p></p><p>From Thom Hogan's review of the 2 cameras:</p><p></p><p>"<span style="color: #440011"><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">Okay, so what about the AA (D800) or lack of an AA (D800E)? Does that make a difference. At f/8 and above, not really. Diffraction is a worse sin than anti-aliasing, at least when you use the "visible" criteria. Technically, I measure a bit more resolution on the E than the non-E in these mid-range diffracted apertures. But looking at pixel views of images, the diffraction kills the edge acuity that the E normally provides you. I'm not convinced there's enough gain to warrant the difference if you're shooting at f/5.6 or above all the time. That shouldn't surprise anyone, considering that I concluded the same thing with a D3x (24mp) with and without an AA filter. In that case, the "without" was optical glass, with no fuzz/defuzz system like the D800E has. </span></span><span style="color: #440011"><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">Below f/5.6, things are completely different, and surprisingly so. From f/1.4 to f/4 the D800E has crisp, clean edges and is clearly gaining something from the lack of an anti-aliasing filter. But the D800 is different. While the D800 has what I would characterize as a weak AA filter (I've got plenty of moire examples from it, and can produce color fringing with it, too), it exhibits a different pattern than the D800E. From f/1.4 to f/4 there's a small but steady degradation of edges, almost like some form of weak diffraction were in play. That's actually entirely possible, as Nikon claims that there is a waveplate involved in the AA filter, and it may be the culprit. </span></span></p><p><span style="color: #440011"><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">So basically the conventional guess about who would want an E and who would want a non-E are exactly backwards. If you shoot wide open or near wide open with your lenses all the time (portraits, wildlife, sports, etc.) there's something to be said for having the D800E. If you shoot landscapes and are going for depth of field, diffraction will be your real enemy, not the AA filter."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #440011"><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #440011"><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'"><a href="http://www.dslrbodies.com/cameras/current-nikon-dslr-reviews/nikon-d800--d800e-review.html" target="_blank">Nikon D800 & D800E Review | byThom | Thom Hogan</a></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jwstl, post: 191165, member: 12977"] For landscapes I'd stick with the D800 over the E. By all accounts, the E only shows the increased resolution at apertures around 5.6 and wider. Most landscapes are shot at f/8 and higher where there's little difference between the 2 cameras. From Thom Hogan's review of the 2 cameras: "[COLOR=#440011][FONT=Trebuchet MS]Okay, so what about the AA (D800) or lack of an AA (D800E)? Does that make a difference. At f/8 and above, not really. Diffraction is a worse sin than anti-aliasing, at least when you use the "visible" criteria. Technically, I measure a bit more resolution on the E than the non-E in these mid-range diffracted apertures. But looking at pixel views of images, the diffraction kills the edge acuity that the E normally provides you. I'm not convinced there's enough gain to warrant the difference if you're shooting at f/5.6 or above all the time. That shouldn't surprise anyone, considering that I concluded the same thing with a D3x (24mp) with and without an AA filter. In that case, the "without" was optical glass, with no fuzz/defuzz system like the D800E has. [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#440011][FONT=Trebuchet MS]Below f/5.6, things are completely different, and surprisingly so. From f/1.4 to f/4 the D800E has crisp, clean edges and is clearly gaining something from the lack of an anti-aliasing filter. But the D800 is different. While the D800 has what I would characterize as a weak AA filter (I've got plenty of moire examples from it, and can produce color fringing with it, too), it exhibits a different pattern than the D800E. From f/1.4 to f/4 there's a small but steady degradation of edges, almost like some form of weak diffraction were in play. That's actually entirely possible, as Nikon claims that there is a waveplate involved in the AA filter, and it may be the culprit. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#440011][FONT=Trebuchet MS]So basically the conventional guess about who would want an E and who would want a non-E are exactly backwards. If you shoot wide open or near wide open with your lenses all the time (portraits, wildlife, sports, etc.) there's something to be said for having the D800E. If you shoot landscapes and are going for depth of field, diffraction will be your real enemy, not the AA filter." [URL="http://www.dslrbodies.com/cameras/current-nikon-dslr-reviews/nikon-d800--d800e-review.html"]Nikon D800 & D800E Review | byThom | Thom Hogan[/URL][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D800/D800E
800 or 800E ???
Top