Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
80-400 lens on the d7100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 308975" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>If you do not need to zoom in close, then primes would be better option. The 80-400 is at par with the 300mmF4 with TC1.4 as far as sharpness goes, but you get a much less expensive and lighter package with the prime, but there is no VR here.</p><p><a href="http://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-300mm-f4d/4" target="_blank">Nikon 300mm f/4D AF-S Review</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bythom.com/300lens.htm" target="_blank">Nikon 300mm f/4 Nikkor Review by Thom Hogan</a></p><p></p><p> From what I have read, the latest 500mm F4 is the preferred lense for birding as it is lighter than the 600mm and has excellent IQ with all the TC.</p><p><a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/500vs600.shtml" target="_blank">500 vs 600</a></p><p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3617382#forum-post-53027677" target="_blank">Birding with a 500mm F4 or 600mm F4: Nikon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review</a></p><p><a href="http://www.garryblack.com/ae22.htm" target="_blank">Which Lens for Wildlife; 400mm, 500mm or 600mm</a></p><p></p><p>As far as speed of focus and DR is concerned the FX cameras are better than the D7100. The least cost (and VFM) option is the D610, which has a 2EV advantage in DR, and should focus faster in low light.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 308975, member: 16090"] If you do not need to zoom in close, then primes would be better option. The 80-400 is at par with the 300mmF4 with TC1.4 as far as sharpness goes, but you get a much less expensive and lighter package with the prime, but there is no VR here. [url=http://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-300mm-f4d/4]Nikon 300mm f/4D AF-S Review[/url] [url=http://www.bythom.com/300lens.htm]Nikon 300mm f/4 Nikkor Review by Thom Hogan[/url] From what I have read, the latest 500mm F4 is the preferred lense for birding as it is lighter than the 600mm and has excellent IQ with all the TC. [url=http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/500vs600.shtml]500 vs 600[/url] [url=http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3617382#forum-post-53027677]Birding with a 500mm F4 or 600mm F4: Nikon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review[/url] [url=http://www.garryblack.com/ae22.htm]Which Lens for Wildlife; 400mm, 500mm or 600mm[/url] As far as speed of focus and DR is concerned the FX cameras are better than the D7100. The least cost (and VFM) option is the D610, which has a 2EV advantage in DR, and should focus faster in low light. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
80-400 lens on the d7100
Top