8 bit vs. 16 bit prints

Scott Ramsey

Senior Member
I just noticed that I have been processing all of my photos as 8 bit in PS CC Camera RAW because I guess that is their default. Is there an appreciable difference in 8 bit vs. 16 bit when printing images? I was getting ready to order some prints and need to know if it is worth re-processing them as 16 bit.
thanks
Scott Ramsey
 

WayneF

Senior Member
That 8 bits is definitely what you want. Your video monitor and your printer and your online printing services (and all JPG files) are 8 bits only. There is absolutely no way you can actually see 16 bits, it will be shown as 8 bits. You have no way to look at 16 bits.

However, it is very good that the Raw images are 12 bits (16 bits in the computer) because tonal shifts can survive being more extreme.
The additional bits are for the edit processing shifts, like white balance and gamma and contrast, etc.

After you have done these corrections (in 16 bit Raw), then you have no more need for 16 bits.
If you need to go back later, you still have the original 12 bit Raw file.

The only exception and reason to output 16 bits might be if you planned additional serious editing in some other editor (serious tonal data shifts, not just cropping or resampling or sharpening - for which 8 bits is plenty). Except of course, only the most serious editors can do 16 bit editing.

But then our viewing devices can only look at 8 bit images. And any JPG file is only 8 bits (TIF and PNG can be 16 bit files, but you have no way to view them as such).
 
Last edited:
Top