Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NVSteve" data-source="post: 131625" data-attributes="member: 13248"><p>From the lab testing posted online, the Tamron is better than the original 70-200 VR and on par/somewhat better than the current Canon 70-200, which says a lot.  I wouldn't go for the old VR on FX because of the lack of edge to edge sharpness, along with the fact that most of them are out of warranty.  So, $1200-$1300 for a VR with no warranty (which still seems to be dropping in price), or $1499 or so for the new Tamron with VC.  Or, another $800-900 for the VRII.  If I had lots of time on my hands, which I don't, I would buy the VRII and the new Tamron & put them through my own battery of tests.</p></blockquote><p></p>