Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D90
70-300....with or without VR??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sharonkw" data-source="post: 664148" data-attributes="member: 44624"><p>I had one with VR for my Canon, and loved it. Now I am reading reviews that the Nikon version w/o VR is a much better lens.</p><p></p><p>Granted, I am a few years older now <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />, (and camera shake may be a problem), but would still order the non VR if the above statement has been experienced.</p><p></p><p>Has anyone found this to be true??</p><p></p><p>Opinions & experiences please.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sharonkw, post: 664148, member: 44624"] I had one with VR for my Canon, and loved it. Now I am reading reviews that the Nikon version w/o VR is a much better lens. Granted, I am a few years older now :rolleyes:, (and camera shake may be a problem), but would still order the non VR if the above statement has been experienced. Has anyone found this to be true?? Opinions & experiences please. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D90
70-300....with or without VR??
Top