Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="evisphoto" data-source="post: 40456" data-attributes="member: 1039">As an owner of the 70-300VR G, and former owner if the 55-200, I would like to say the 70-300 is well worth the extra expense. It's sharper than the 55-200, has the true ring type AFS motor, so you can do manual focus touchups at the twist of the focus ring, and the VR is just flat out amazing. And it's also built very, very well. I highly reccommend it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Here's a couple of sampls I shot with mine:<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v124/evisphoto/DSC_5815sm.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v124/evisphoto/DSC_4196bw_sm.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="evisphoto, post: 40456, member: 1039"] As an owner of the 70-300VR G, and former owner if the 55-200, I would like to say the 70-300 is well worth the extra expense. It's sharper than the 55-200, has the true ring type AFS motor, so you can do manual focus touchups at the twist of the focus ring, and the VR is just flat out amazing. And it's also built very, very well. I highly reccommend it :) Here's a couple of sampls I shot with mine: [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v124/evisphoto/DSC_5815sm.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v124/evisphoto/DSC_4196bw_sm.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification