Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
70-200 Sigma or Tamron?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 600840" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>tamron 70-200 non vc was crap. ALL sigma 70-200 are crap. I had the 70-200 HSM and they lack contrast and sharpness from 2.8-4.5 at f/5 they wake and then there is no use for them. all that weight and not useable. they are supposed to release a 70-200 sport edition thats worthwhile. the tamron 70-200VC is excellent. vignetting at the longer end. af is a bit slower then the nikon. not as sharp on the 2.8 at the longer end. would benefit from a minor aperture stop down to 3.5 then its gtg. great lens and not because of the price. though the front zoom ring is a pita. screws up my workflow. though <strong>if </strong>I needed a 70-200 itd probably be it. was considering upgrading to the vr2 but that breathing issue is a big issue</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 600840, member: 14443"] tamron 70-200 non vc was crap. ALL sigma 70-200 are crap. I had the 70-200 HSM and they lack contrast and sharpness from 2.8-4.5 at f/5 they wake and then there is no use for them. all that weight and not useable. they are supposed to release a 70-200 sport edition thats worthwhile. the tamron 70-200VC is excellent. vignetting at the longer end. af is a bit slower then the nikon. not as sharp on the 2.8 at the longer end. would benefit from a minor aperture stop down to 3.5 then its gtg. great lens and not because of the price. though the front zoom ring is a pita. screws up my workflow. though [B]if [/B]I needed a 70-200 itd probably be it. was considering upgrading to the vr2 but that breathing issue is a big issue [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
70-200 Sigma or Tamron?
Top
