Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pedroj" data-source="post: 77592" data-attributes="member: 9297">Rasmus Said[I have the nikkor 55-300 lens, and it's quite ok. However it's not&nbsp; terribly sharp on the long end. So I'm considering upgrading to the&nbsp; 70-200, which should be ultra sharp. &nbsp;I know the 70-200 is an fx lens, so it'll be something like 105-300 on my d7000. The loss of the 55-105 area isn't a problem.] 
The crop factor [1.5] has to do with the camera...The&nbsp; 55-300mm is 55-300mm as the 70-200mm is 70-200mm

If you want a very good 300mm lens get the 300mm F4 AF-S or it's older brother 300mm F4 AF IF ED
Another option is the 80-200mm F2.8 it doesn't have VR but is About $1200 cheaper then the 70-200mm F2.8</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pedroj, post: 77592, member: 9297"] Rasmus Said [I have the nikkor 55-300 lens, and it's quite ok. However it's not terribly sharp on the long end. So I'm considering upgrading to the 70-200, which should be ultra sharp. I know the 70-200 is an fx lens, so it'll be something like 105-300 on my d7000. The loss of the 55-105 area isn't a problem.] [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] The crop factor [1.5] has to do with the camera...The 55-300mm is 55-300mm as the 70-200mm is 70-200mm If you want a very good 300mm lens get the 300mm F4 AF-S or it's older brother 300mm F4 AF IF ED [/COLOR][/LEFT] Another option is the 80-200mm F2.8 it doesn't have VR but is About $1200 cheaper then the 70-200mm F2.8 [/QUOTE]

Verification