Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rasmus" data-source="post: 77521" data-attributes="member: 8553">I have the nikkor 55-300 lens, and it's quite ok. However it's not terribly sharp on the long end. So I'm considering upgrading to the 70-200, which should be ultra sharp. I know the 70-200 is an fx lens, so it'll be something like 105-300 on my d7000. The loss of the 55-105 area isn't a problem. But does any of you have any actual experience with both lenses; maybe from doing the same upgrade. How big does the size difference feel? Is the lack of vr on the 70-200 an issue? Is the improved IQ very noticeable, or minor? any other comments or recommendations(like third party lenses) is greatly appreciated as well <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Sendt fra min GT-I9300 med Tapatalk2</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rasmus, post: 77521, member: 8553"] I have the nikkor 55-300 lens, and it's quite ok. However it's not terribly sharp on the long end. So I'm considering upgrading to the 70-200, which should be ultra sharp. I know the 70-200 is an fx lens, so it'll be something like 105-300 on my d7000. The loss of the 55-105 area isn't a problem. But does any of you have any actual experience with both lenses; maybe from doing the same upgrade. How big does the size difference feel? Is the lack of vr on the 70-200 an issue? Is the improved IQ very noticeable, or minor? any other comments or recommendations(like third party lenses) is greatly appreciated as well :-) Sendt fra min GT-I9300 med Tapatalk2 [/QUOTE]

Verification