Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 472551" data-attributes="member: 14443">[USER=13155]@skene[/USER], is that you? looks like adam sandler <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />if you shoot smaller than 2.2, the aperture blades will start showing up more so it wouldnt matter if its the D or G. the sharpness with the G is better from the get go and is about 2/3 stop sharper. meaning, you have to stop down 2/3 of a stop to get the sharpness.AF is slower on the G. D makes a little noise. D is very fast to focus. 1.4G is extremely slow to focus. 1.8G is an improvement. and sharper than the 1.4G. when both shot at 1.8.if you shoot from 2.8 onwards, same same for your situation. D7100 can use both. wider than 2.8 and youll benefit from the G. its not a bit more like you mentioned, its 80% of the price more than the D.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 472551, member: 14443"] [USER=13155]@skene[/USER], is that you? looks like adam sandler :) if you shoot smaller than 2.2, the aperture blades will start showing up more so it wouldnt matter if its the D or G. the sharpness with the G is better from the get go and is about 2/3 stop sharper. meaning, you have to stop down 2/3 of a stop to get the sharpness. AF is slower on the G. D makes a little noise. D is very fast to focus. 1.4G is extremely slow to focus. 1.8G is an improvement. and sharper than the 1.4G. when both shot at 1.8. if you shoot from 2.8 onwards, same same for your situation. D7100 can use both. wider than 2.8 and youll benefit from the G. its not a bit more like you mentioned, its 80% of the price more than the D. [/QUOTE]

Verification